Formula

CAS

Hg

7439-97-6

1.

Anonymous, Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in North America: 1972. Archives of Dermatology, 1973. 108(4): p. 537-40.

2.

Feuerman, E.J., Recurrent contact dermatitis caused by mercury in amalgam dental fillings. International Journal of Dermatology, 1975. 14(9): p. 657-60.

3.

Fisher, A.A., Allergic dermatitis medicamentosa: the "systemic contact-type variety". Cutis, 1976. 18(5): p. 637-42.

4.

Behnam, B. and T. Al-Saleem, Skin manifestations of mercury poisoning. Contact Dermatitis, 1977. 3(3): p. 113-4.

5.

van Ketel, W.G. and C.G. Roeleveld, A curious case of allergy to mercuric compounds. Contact Dermatitis, 1977. 3(2): p. 106.

6.

Moriearty, P.L., C. Pereira, and N.A. Guimaraes, Contact dermatitis in Salvador, Brazil. Contact Dermatitis, 1978. 4(4): p. 185-9.

7.

Camarasa, J.M., First epidemiological study of contact dermatitis in Spain - 1977. Spanish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. Supplementum, 1979. 59(85): p. 33-7.

8.

Harahap, M., D. Nasution, and A.S. Siregar, Contact allergens in north Sumatra (Indonesia). Contact Dermatitis, 1979. 5(4): p. 271-2.

9.

Rudzki, E., Occupational dermatitis among health service workers. Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupational & Environmental Dermatoses, 1979. 27(4): p. 112-5.

10.

Forstrom, L., et al., Merthiolate hypersensitivity and vaccination. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(4): p. 241-5.

11.

Hammershoy, O., Contradictory results following patch testing with Finn Chambers. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(3): p. 216-8.

12.

Kalveram, K.J., C. Rapp-Frick, and G. Sorck, Misleading patch test results with aluminum Finn chambers and mercury salts. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(7): p. 507-8.

13.

Levy, A., D. Hanau, and J. Foussereau, Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(4): p. 260-2.

14.

Swinyer, L.J., Allergic contact dermatitis from metallic mercury. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(3): p. 226-7.

15.

van Ketel, W.G., Sensitization to mercury from Mercurochrome. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(7): p. 499.

16.

Vermeiden, I., et al., Mercury exanthem as occupational dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 1980. 6(2): p. 88-90.

17.

Ancona, A., et al., Mercury sensitivity in a dentist. Contact Dermatitis, 1982. 8(3): p. 218.

18.

Alomar, A., J.G. Camarasa, and M. Barnadas, Addison's disease and contact dermatitis from mercury in a soap. Contact Dermatitis, 1983. 9(1): p. 76.

19.

Nakayama, H., et al., Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis, 1983. 9(5): p. 411-7.

20.

Andersen, K.E., N. Hjorth, and T. Menne, The baboon syndrome: systemically-induced allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 10(2): p. 97-100.

21.

Mobacken, H., et al., Oral lichen planus: hypersensitivity to dental restoration material. Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 10(1): p. 11-5.

22.

Nebenfuhrer, L., et al., Mercury allergy in Budapest. Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 10(2): p. 121-2.

23.

Lindemayr, H. and S. Becerano, Interaction of mercury compounds and aluminium. Contact Dermatitis, 1985. 13(4): p. 274.

24.

Sun, C.C., Allergic contact dermatitis of the face from contact with nickel and ammoniated mercury in spectacle frames and skin-lightening creams. Contact Dermatitis, 1987. 17(5): p. 306-9.

25.

Bartolo, E. and F.M. Brandao, Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 18(3): p. 172.

26.

Goh, C.L. and S.K. Ng, Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from metallic mercury. Contact Dermatitis, 1988. 19(3): p. 232-3.

27.

Pambor, M. and A. Timmel, Mercury dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 20(2): p. 157.

28.

Aberer, W., G. Gerstner, and H. Pehamberger, Ammoniated mercury ointment: outdated but still in use. Contact Dermatitis, 1990. 23(3): p. 168-71.

29.

Larsson, A., et al., Irritant and sensitizing potential of copper, mercury and tin salts in experimental contact stomatitis of rat oral mucosa. Contact Dermatitis, 1990. 23(3): p. 146-53.

30.

Seidenari, S., et al., Patch and prick test study of 593 healthy subjects. Contact Dermatitis, 1990. 23(3): p. 162-7.

31.

Wekkeli, M., et al., Mercury as a contact allergen. Contact Dermatitis, 1990. 22(5): p. 295-6.

32.

von Mayenburg, J., J. Rakoski, and C. Szliska, Patch testing with amalgam at various concentrations. Contact Dermatitis, 1991. 24(4): p. 266-9.

33.

Faria, A. and C. de Freitas, Systemic contact dermatitis due to mercury. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 27(2): p. 110-1.

34.

Goncalo, S., et al., Allergic contact dermatitis in children. A multicenter study of the Portuguese Contact Dermatitis Group (GPEDC). Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 26(2): p. 112-5.

35.

Kubo, Y., et al., Does patch testing with ammoniated mercury in a Finn Chamber give a false positive reaction?. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 27(2): p. 118-9.

36.

Laine, J., et al., Resolution of oral lichenoid lesions after replacement of amalgam restorations in patients allergic to mercury compounds. British Journal of Dermatology, 1992. 126(1): p. 10-5.

37.

Mellstrom, G.A., K. Sommar, and J.E. Wahlberg, Patch test preparations of metallic mercury under the microscope. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 26(1): p. 64-5.

38.

Mellstrom, G.A. and J.E. Wahlberg, Patch test preparations of mercury ammonium chloride under the microscope. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 27(3): p. 193-4.

39.

Nordlind, K. and S. Liden, Patch test reactions to metal salts in patients with oral mucosal lesions associated with amalgam restorations. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 27(3): p. 157-60.

40.

Schrallhammer-Benkler, K., et al., Acute mercury intoxication with lichenoid drug eruption followed by mercury contact allergy and development of antinuclear antibodies. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 1992. 72(4): p. 294-6.

41.

Bircher, A.J., A. von Schulthess, and G. Henning, Oral lichenoid lesions and mercury sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis, 1993. 29(5): p. 275-6.

42.

Handley, J., D. Todd, and D. Burrows, Mercury allergy in a contact dermatitis clinic in Northern Ireland. Contact Dermatitis, 1993. 29(5): p. 258-61.

43.

Kanerva, L., et al., Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from mercury. Contact Dermatitis, 1993. 28(1): p. 26-8.

44.

Pirker, C., et al., Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thimerosal hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis, 1993. 29(3): p. 152-4.

45.

Dillarstone, A., Mercury allergy [letter]. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 31(3): p. 206.

46.

Dillarstone, A., Mercury allergy [letter; comment]. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 31(3): p. 206.

47.

Kawai, K., et al., Allergic contact dermatitis due to mercury in a wedding ring and a cosmetic. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 31(5): p. 330-1.

48.

Osawa, J., et al., Gold dermatitis due to ear piercing: correlations between gold and mercury hypersensitivities. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 31(2): p. 89-91.

49.

Pelaez Hernandez, A., et al., Mercurochrome allergy: concurrence of 2 hypersensitivity mechanisms in the same patient. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 30(1): p. 48-9.

50.

Vena, G.A., et al., Mercury exanthem. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 31(4): p. 214-6.

51.

Vilaplana, J., C. Romaguera, and F. Cornellana, Contact dermatitis and adverse oral mucous membrane reactions related to the use of dental prostheses. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 30(2): p. 80-4.