Formula |
CAS |
C5H8O2 |
80-62-6 |
CAS: Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number
Background
Methyl ester of methacrylic acid which polymerizes forming a clear plastic
known as Lucite, Plexiglas, Perspex.
Kopula et al. found positive reactions to methyl methacrylate in 32%
of all acrylate-allergic patients and 10% of nail-allergic patients. They
suggested that it may not be a good screening allergen for individuals
allergic to nail acrylates.
Fisher showed that the usual sensitizing agent of acrylic prostheses
was methyl methacrylate monomer. Kanerva et al successfully coated an allergenic
methacrylate prosthesis with a UV light-cured coating.
Synonyms
Acrylate monomer
Acrylate plastic
Acrylate resin
Methyl methacrylate
MMA
Uses
Methacrylic monomer used in
Cosmetics (artificial sculptured nails, nail extenders)
Dental (dentures, fillings, coatings)
Medical (adhesive tape, contact lenses, hearing aids, surgical prostheses
bone cement)
Industrial (sealants, printing plates, inks, and coatings of glass,
rubber, and textiles)
Cross-Reactions
Unusual Reactions
References
1.
|
Marshall, M., A.
Guill, and R.B. Odom, Hearing aid dermatitis.
Archives of Dermatology, 1978. 114(7): p. 1050-1.
|
2.
|
Nethercott, J.R.,
Skin problems associated with multifunctional
acrylic monomers in ultraviolet curing inks. British Journal of Dermatology,
1978. 98(5): p. 541-52.
|
3.
|
Fisher,
A.A., Cross reactions between methyl methacrylate monomer
and acrylic monomers presently used in acrylic nail preparations. Contact
Dermatitis, 1980. 6(5): p. 345-7.
|
4.
|
van der
Walle, H.B., et al., Sensitizing potential of 14 mono (meth) acrylates in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis, 1982.
8(4):
p. 223-35.
|
5.
|
Estlander, T., R.
Rajaniemi, and R. Jolanki, Hand dermatitis
in dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 10(4): p. 201-5.
|
6.
|
Kassis, V., P.
Vedel, and E. Darre, Contact dermatitis to methyl
methacrylate. Contact Dermatitis, 1984. 11(1): p. 26-8.
|
7.
|
Mathias,
C.G. and H.I. Maibach, Allergic contact dermatitis from
anaerobic acrylic sealants. Archives of Dermatology, 1984. 120(9):
p. 1202-5.
|
8.
|
Romaguera, C., F.
Grimalt, and J. Vilaplana, Methyl methacrylate
prosthesis dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 1985. 12(3): p. 172.
|
9.
|
van
Joost, T., J. van Ulsen, and L.A. van Loon, Contact allergy
to denture materials in the burning mouth syndrome. Contact Dermatitis,
1988. 18(2): p. 97-9.
|
10.
|
Fousssereau, J., et al.,
Contact dermatitis from methyl methacrylate
in an above-knee prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 20(1):
p. 69-70.
|
11.
|
Kanerva, L., T.
Estlander, and R. Jolanki, Allergic contact
dermatitis from dental composite resins due to aromatic epoxy acrylates
and aliphatic acrylates. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 20(3): p.
201-11.
|
12.
|
Kanzaki, T., et al.,
Contact stomatitis due to methyl methacrylate
monomer. Contact Dermatitis, 1989. 20(2): p. 146-8.
|
13.
|
Farli, M., et al.,
Occupational contact dermatitis in 2 dental
technicians. Contact Dermatitis, 1990. 22(5): p. 282-7.
|
14.
|
Corazza, M., A.
Virgili, and S. Martina, Allergic contact stomatitis
from methyl methacrylate in a dental prosthesis, with a persistent patch
test reaction. Contact Dermatitis, 1992. 26(3): p. 210-1.
|
15.
|
Kanerva, L., et al.,
Occupational allergic contact dermatitis
caused by exposure to acrylates during work with dental prostheses.
Contact Dermatitis, 1993. 28(5): p. 268-75.
|
16.
|
Vilaplana, J., C.
Romaguera, and F. Cornellana, Contact dermatitis
and adverse oral mucous membrane reactions related to the use of dental
prostheses. Contact Dermatitis, 1994. 30(2): p. 80-4.
|
17.
|
Kanerva, L., et al.,
Successful coating of an allergenic acrylate-based
dental prosthesis. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 1995. 6(1):
p. 24-27.
|
18.
|
Koppula, S., J.
Fellman, and F. Storrs, Screening allergens
for acrylate dermatitis associated with artificial nails. American
Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 1995. 6(2): p. 78-85.
|
13-08-2011
(JRM) - www.huidziekten.nl
|
|